And so while the cross was certainly important, it was God
taking up flesh in the person of Christ that more than anything else became the
centering point for first considerations about the meaning of salvation. As
Christ takes on flesh, so he takes on the concerns of humanity, our frailty, our
fallenness, and the distance that by our very natures makes it impossible for
us to come to God.
All of this is raised within the context of the problem of
transcendence, a question that seemed more critical when the reality of the First
World War made it clear to European theologians that the liberal guarantee of a
confidence in the power of humanity to overcome its own moral shortcomings was a
tragic overestimation. This sensitivity to the gap that divided human ability
from divine being and attempt to find an answer was a way to explain how a good
God could remain good despite a world that was debased of any such goodness.
From a theological position, this meant that events like the
First World War debunked the notion that commandment-based ethics (Gebot
Ethik) were the guarantees of salvation desired by humanity.
Reconciled as humanity is through this mystery, divine
concern takes up humanity so that salvation does not emerge on a cross but as
an act divine self-making that begins in a manger. The realization of God’s love for us is not
that Christ died for our sins, but that God took flesh to himself at all. Salvation is found first in the Christmas
story.
No comments:
Post a Comment