As we are entering into Palm Sunday tomorrow, I wanted to
reflect for a moment on this event as it occurred in the gospels. Christians
have long been told that Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem coincided with
Passover. The reason for this has profound theological implications; namely, Jesus would
be the Passover sacrifice that would save men from their sins. While
theologians like to place bets just on how much Jesus actually understood of
his mission, more importantly, the question of whether he entered on Passover
becomes important to how we can interpret a theology that for Christians
relies heavily on this sequencing. But there is another explanation as well:
Jesus triumphal entry had nothing to do with a hidden theology that would only
be known to the faith community in its soteriological expression and was most likely a confusion of two separate Jewish holidays.
One thing everyone does agree on: Jesus’ entry into
Jerusalem was very much a messianic event. The prophecies attached to Jesus
coming into the city are taken from the book of Zechariah. Depending on which account you read (Matthew or Mark), Jesus enters into the city on one or two donkeys (also an allusion to Zechariah). The Christian tradition prefers to understand the messianic prophecies
with regard to Passover, so his crucifixion takes on an entirely new meaning. While
his sacrifice takes the place of the temple animal sacrifice, the messianic king does
not conquer kingdoms, he comes to conquer sins. He does not establish a
physical kingdom on earth but a spiritual one. Passover is also associated with the return of
Elijah as the messiah. So early Christians must have thought that this would
have been the most appropriate time for Jesus’s return. Jesus himself is confronted with this important Jewish belief in a few places in the gospels, a charge which Jesus deflects.
Having said all this, the problem is the tradition of Palm Sunday is probably
misplaced in the Jewish calendar and has nothing to do with Passover. Rather it
was most likely Sukkoth when Jesus entered Jerusalem, a festival that happens months earlier and would mean
that Jesus was not arrested and held for a week, but probably much
longer. In fact, it would mean that the Last Supper too would have not been a Passover
Seder but rather a common meal.
The textual evidence is as follows: The people who come to
greet Jesus do so with shouts of Hosannah and with palm “branches.” Why would
so many people have palm branches available to them, especially since this does not
show up anywhere in the Passover ritualism or in the prophecies of Zechariah?
Where the use of palm fronds DO show up is during Sukkoth (Leviticus 23:40).
The lulavim (כפת) are made up of unopened palm fronds used in the construction of the Sukkoth (booths) along with
the symbolism of the etrog (citron) as well as other types of wild growing
vegetation like myrtle. The praises of Hosanna that Jesus is confronted by as he enters the city are important to Judaism
primarily at Sukkoth when the Jewish liturgical prayer cycle called the "Hosanna
service" is recited each morning of the festival. Another interesting note with regard to the Last Supper is
that during the Passover Seder, matzot would have
been eaten, but the gospels tell us that it was bread. While this is
unspecific, it might suggest that this was not the unleavened bread eaten by
Jews.
So as you prepare for Palm Sunday tomorrow and the traditional
Lenten calendar prepares us to enter into the week before Jesus’ execution, by
observing a week between Palm Sunday and Easter as well, remember that it might
have been a number of months before Jesus was actually sentenced and executed from
the time he entered Jerusalem.
No comments:
Post a Comment