I certainly
understand the need for spiritualism. We hypothesize root causes. Personal
effort appeals to a certain type of spiritual person who does not identify with
naming a God and all the baggage this carries. It removes the responsibility of
defending doctrinaire accounts of the faith and allows them to move fluidly
through the tradition without having to deal with what they dislike. I get it.
Buddhism, at
least in the form it is often received in the West, may siphon out factors that
are not necessarily testaments to human effort. However, it is important to
note that other forms of Buddhism do not. I was reminded of this in an exchange
I had at the regional American Academy of Religions meeting. As I was speaking
with Dr. John Thatamanil (Union Theological Seminary), he spoke of a kind of
“protestant reformation” that occurs in Buddhism in about 9th-12th
century and becomes the standard expression in Japanese Buddhism. It was
something that I have been connecting now for some time. By "protestant
reformation," we were of course thinking of the move from a works-based form of
religious expression to one of confessional form. This is perhaps not the
greatest expression of all the reformation addressed and leaves room for
expansion, but it does get at a similar concept in Shin Buddhism: the ordering
of jiriki and tariki.
There are
three narratives that come to mind that suggest Buddhism is not consigned to the
bank of merit it has often been romanticized in.
Shin
Buddhism is the most obvious expression here. Here, the name of Amida Buddha is
venerated. By recitation of the name, strength is found in the other (the
practice known as tariki) as opposed
to jiriki, the practice of inner-self
concentration.
A second
example is the story of the Buddha who comes to his friend Gopala. The latter
begs the Buddha not to leave him for fear he will fail in his sadhana (spiritual exercises) and return
to adharma. So the Buddha leaves the
imprint of his shadow on a cave wall. This is supposed to infuse righteousness
that makes Gopala’s ability to keep dharma
possible.
A third form
found in Tibetan Buddhism is the Sutra
Pagpa Chulung Rolyay Do. It is a mantra that was written by Lama Zopa
Rinpoche, and it is thought that merely casting one’s gaze upon it purifies one
of negativity for many eons. There is a resemblance to the nehushtan in this manner of “faith” (the story of Moses and the
bronze serpent). Certainly John thought it a faith-act, as the gospel writer
records, “just as Moses lifted up the serpent, Jesus was also to be lifted up.”
(John 3:14)
No comments:
Post a Comment